<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: You can filter an individual Facebook account?!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://internetfiltered.wordpress.com/2008/05/06/you-can-filter-an-individual-facebook-account/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://internetfiltered.wordpress.com/2008/05/06/you-can-filter-an-individual-facebook-account/</link>
	<description>Share with us your thoughts &#38; rantings</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 15:43:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: sy</title>
		<link>http://internetfiltered.wordpress.com/2008/05/06/you-can-filter-an-individual-facebook-account/#comment-25</link>
		<dc:creator>sy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 15:26:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://internetfiltered.wordpress.com/?p=7#comment-25</guid>
		<description>I will not comment on the political implications of China&#039;s actions and decisions towards Tibet. What I would like to point out and question is, given that you have the freedom of speech for your political/humanitarism (etc.) beliefs, does it then mean that you have to right to make use of a public tool (Facebook) to proprogate actions acting on your beliefs (making known plans to protest during Olympic torch relay). I believe freedom of speech comes with responsibility. Even if you intended to announce your plans to the whole wide world, do you have the right to do it on a social network where you agreed to a bunch of terms and conditions? I say do it on your own hosted website to whatever audience you can harness. A much reiterated point is freedom of speech is not equivalent to freedom from being prosecuted for what you say.
Secondly, can I point out the inappropriateness of protesting at the Olympic torch relay event when Olympic Games emphasis sportsmanship, and friendship across countries? It is not a forum for you to express your political stands. The foreign embassy is more appropriate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I will not comment on the political implications of China&#8217;s actions and decisions towards Tibet. What I would like to point out and question is, given that you have the freedom of speech for your political/humanitarism (etc.) beliefs, does it then mean that you have to right to make use of a public tool (Facebook) to proprogate actions acting on your beliefs (making known plans to protest during Olympic torch relay). I believe freedom of speech comes with responsibility. Even if you intended to announce your plans to the whole wide world, do you have the right to do it on a social network where you agreed to a bunch of terms and conditions? I say do it on your own hosted website to whatever audience you can harness. A much reiterated point is freedom of speech is not equivalent to freedom from being prosecuted for what you say.<br />
Secondly, can I point out the inappropriateness of protesting at the Olympic torch relay event when Olympic Games emphasis sportsmanship, and friendship across countries? It is not a forum for you to express your political stands. The foreign embassy is more appropriate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
